.jpg)
Over a third of sales reps are turning over every year. Only around 30% are hitting target. And leaders are quietly relying on a handful of top performers to drag the quarter over the line.
The problem is not effort. Most reps are working hard. The problem is the system they are trapped in.
We have normalised a profession where people are expected to perform without a shared standard, then act surprised when results are volatile. Training is the first budget cut, but it is the only lever that compounds. Tools do not compound. They just increase motion.
Nobody gets a degree in B2B sales
Most people fall into sales. They learn by soaking up what is around them, a bit of mentoring here, a bit of coaching there, and then they are handed a quota and expected to deliver. The lucky ones stumble across a manager who actually invests in them. The rest spend four or five jobs figuring it out the hard way.
That is a bruising way to build a profession.
The organisations that get this right are not the biggest. They are the most intentional. A small team with a clean process and a shared standard will consistently outperform a larger team running on hope and headcount.
The tools are not the problem. The foundation is.
Many teams do not need more leads. They need to close the ones they already get. That is a skills issue, not a technology issue.
You can have every tool on the market. If the rep cannot qualify properly, cannot defend pricing, and cannot connect what they sell to a real business outcome, the stack is irrelevant.
Commercial fluency is one of the most underdeveloped skills in sales right now. Reps cave on price not because they are weak, but because nobody ever explained the business model underneath. What does a small discount actually cost over a two-year subscription? What happens to margin when you keep making exceptions? What does that mean for the business, and ultimately for their own job? Give people that context and the conversations change.
If deals are not going live, look upstream
One of the clearest signs of a broken sales process is poor conversion from signature to go-live. When that number is low, most organisations focus on onboarding. The problem is almost never onboarding. It is what was sold, to whom, and on what basis.
The wrong customers were let through. The problem was never truly defined. The outcome was oversold to hit a number that was inflated after a funding round.
Fix the qualification upstream and the downstream problems largely disappear.
The same logic applies to ICP. It is not a workshop exercise you do once and file away. It is a living constraint that gets tighter over time as you learn which customers expand, renew, and generate real lifetime value, and which ones drain resource and churn. Cost of acquisition is broadly the same whether the customer is a good fit or a bad one. Lifetime value is not.
The fix is craft, not another platform
Small margins improved daily. Standards that make good selling repeatable. Managers who know how to coach, not just manage pipelines. And honest conversations about what the business is actually trying to do, so the people on the front line can sell with conviction rather than guesswork.
The best salespeople are not magic. They work hard, they improve constantly, and they stay curious about the craft. That is learnable. It is also coachable. But only if the organisation decides it is worth investing in.
Most revenue teams are trying to scale outcomes with tools. The winners will scale capability with standards, coaching, and commercial fluency.
Want to go deeper on this? Listen to the full conversation on the Hit Your Numbers podcast.
If you want to close the skill gaps in your team, speak to us about Team Training. We work with sales leaders to build the standards, process, and coaching habits that make good selling repeatable.
%20copy.png)